Big Trouble Blooming For Raja Petra

Malaysikini reported that Raja Petra Kamarudin could face the rap from the police if the attorney-general finds that there are elements of libel against the government in his June 18 statutory declaration. Malaysiakini report at malaysiakini.com

I am always puzzle as to how our legal system and PDRM work. What I understand is that a complete investigation must be carried out for any crime before any suggestion of actions can be taken.

But in our beloved country Malaysia now (Malaysiakini), if you are within the corridor of power you are always in safe heaven and well protected.

There is always a silent when any crime is hearsay to have connected to vvip. I think I am not wrong to use hearsay because the government also use hearsay to disallow the use of the in-deletable ink for the recent concluded election.

The AG and PDRM will tend to focus on the individual whistle blower and try their best to ensure that what information's given if they are link to any vvip are most likely libel, seditious, defamation or false and action will be taken against the individual even though investigation has yet to be completed.

The puzzle here in Raja Petra case is, the sign of guilt is already in place while the police says investigation is still on going.

Yes I am fully in agreement with the AG and PDRM for highlighting that Raja Petra could face the rap if there are elements of libel against the government but I did not hear what will happen if Raja Petra SD is true?

Here is another question, the SD mentioned individual names but why the report stated against the government?

The government, AG and PDRM must act independently and only the truth be prevailed with no cover ups whatsoever even if they involve vvip.